With the latter approach, the target is rapidly attained. For the first time in the dissertation, the researcher can state a personal opinion when the collected data support it.
Use literature review of past studies and relevant theory to compare if necessary. Daily working requirements unrelated to the manuscript writing might intervene, and prolong manuscript writing process.
This was a focal point for 7 of my 12 participants, and examples of their responses included: A reader must be able to locate your sources. During your analysis of the datayou are likely to have run multiple different analyses from regressions to correlations.
If you have not completed this process, you must do so before beginning to write. I imagine the Results section like a dance with swords -- sometimes you are engaging your partner with the pointy end and sometimes you are gliding alongside them.
If you have qualitative data, ensure that you have edited the quotes and examples to a reasonable length. Several preliminary studies conducted in the past several years suggest that exposure-based therapy can be used in individuals with cooccurring SUDs and PTSD as long as careful attention is paid to substance use.
Before writing down the manuscript, determination of 2—3 titles increases the motivation of the authors towards the manuscript. Writing in Psychology course syllabus.
You have likely worked with the data for a long time and so it might make sense to you. Theoretical Perspective Describe the method of selection of participants sampling and research setting.
They gradually build suspense, then surprise you with a dramatic plot twist just when you thought you'd sussed the story line. Make sure you can justify why you chose one particular test over another. Reminding the reader of what you set out to do A brief description of how you intend approaching the write up of the results Placing the research in context Letting the reader know where they can find the research instruments i.
However the suitability of the title to the agenda of the target journal should be investigated beforehand. Cite authentic sources, theorists or past studies.
Besides, talents, skills, and experiences of the researchers in different fields ie. Briefly state data collection methods, rationale and interpretation. Although the scale of the current situation poses challenges to both service providers and veterans, it also presents unprecedented opportunities for scientific investigation and the continued development of evidence-based interventions for PTSD.
Systematically explain the underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant.
Ideally, you will be able to concisely and effectively link your research to what has been researched previously. Accordingly, the findings of the study are determined in order of their importance, and a paragraph is constructed for each finding Figure 1.
It is advisable to work on a manuscript regularly to avoid losing familiarity with the article. Here you evaluate the research: Do you want to know more about this subject?
Indicating limitations of the study will reflect objectivity of the authors, and provide answers to the questions which will be directed by the reviewers of the journal. Therefore, the authors should go over the manuscript for at least three times after finalization of the manuscript based on joint decision.
Here are some of the common mistakes people make when writing their discussion section: This is the hardest part to write because committees may challenge the interpretation of the data in the Defense. Methodology Explain steps taken, prior to the research, to inform participants of data collection activities and the proposed use of findings.Sep 09, · In the discussion, you write more interpretatively and colorfully about the results.
Whereas you kept it concise in the dissertation conclusion, you write more in-depth about the subject in the discussion section/5().
The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by.
Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion section. Deduction: a claim for how the results can be applied more generally.
For example, describing lessons learned, proposing recommendations that can help improve a. How to Write an Effective Discussion Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research about what you will write in the discussion section from the moment that the study is.
Feb 12, · In essence, the methodology to be followed in writing the ‘Discussion’ section is directly related to the selection of the target journal.
Indeed, in compliance with the writing rules of the target journal, limitations made on the number of words after onset of the writing process, effects mostly the ‘Discussion’ section. SAGE Video Bringing teaching, learning and research to life.
SAGE Books The ultimate social sciences digital library. SAGE Reference The complete guide for your research journey. SAGE Navigator The essential social sciences literature review tool. SAGE Business Cases Real world cases at your fingertips. CQ Press Your definitive resource for politics, policy and people.Download